Quick Answer
In-line and traditional load development differ in their approach to powder charge measurement, with in-line presses utilizing a more precise and consistent method, while traditional presses require manual measurement and loading.
Understanding the Basics of In-Line vs Traditional Load Development
In the world of hand loading hunting ammo, load development is a crucial step in creating reliable and accurate cartridges. When it comes to the method of load development, two main approaches exist: in-line and traditional.
In-Line Load Development
In-line load development utilizes a press that measures the powder charge with great precision. This is typically achieved through a system where the powder is poured into a precise measurement area, allowing the user to accurately weigh and load their cartridges. For example, a popular in-line press, the RCBS Pro 2000, features a 0.1-grain accuracy in its powder measure. This method is ideal for those who want to fine-tune their loads and achieve maximum accuracy.
Traditional Load Development
Traditional load development, on the other hand, requires manual measurement and loading of powder charges. This method typically involves using a separate powder scale to weigh out the precise amount of powder needed, which is then poured into the case. While this method can be accurate, it’s more prone to human error and can be time-consuming, especially when working with small powder charges. However, some hunters prefer this method for its simplicity and ease of use. For example, a popular traditional press, the Lee Classic Turret, can be used with a separate powder scale to measure out precise powder charges.
Find more answers
Browse the full Q&A library by topic, or jump back to the topic this question belongs to.