Quick Answer
Copper bullets outperform lead bullets for deer hunting, offering better terminal performance and less risk of meat contamination, but may be less accurate at long ranges.
Terminal Performance
Copper bullets have gained popularity in the hunting community due to their superior terminal performance. When compared to lead bullets, copper bullets tend to expand more consistently, resulting in deeper penetration and larger wound channels. This leads to a quicker and more humane kill. For example, a copper bullet with a 1.25-inch expansion diameter can deliver a devastating blow to a deer, while a lead bullet may only expand to 1 inch.
Meat Contamination
Lead is a toxic substance that can contaminate meat, posing a risk to hunters and consumers. Copper bullets, on the other hand, are non-toxic and do not pose a risk of meat contamination. In fact, many states and countries have banned the use of lead ammunition in certain areas to protect the environment and public health. If you plan to eat the venison you harvest, copper bullets are a safer choice.
Accuracy and Cost
While copper bullets offer superior terminal performance and safety, they can be less accurate at long ranges. This is due to their heavier weight and higher momentum, which can cause them to drop more precipitously over long distances. Additionally, copper bullets are generally more expensive than lead bullets, especially at higher grain weights. To mitigate this, hunters can use a heavier rifle and slower bolt speed to reduce the effects of bullet drop.
Find more answers
Browse the full Q&A library by topic, or jump back to the topic this question belongs to.
