Comparison of Nosler Partition to AccuBond bullets?

Design and Performance

The Nosler Partition bullet features a unique core design, with a heavy front section and a lighter rear section. This design allows the bullet to maintain its weight and integrity even after passing through heavy bone and tissue. In contrast, the AccuBond bullet features a single, homogeneous core that expands consistently upon impact. According to Nosler, the Partition bullet retains up to 70% of its weight after passing through a deer at 100 yards, while the AccuBond bullet expands to approximately 1.5 times its original diameter.

Field Performance

In terms of field performance, both bullets have been proven to be highly effective. However, the Partition bullet’s unique design provides an added layer of reliability in heavy game. For example, a 200-grain Partition bullet fired from a .30-06 Springfield at 2,700 feet per second (fps) into a 1,000-pound elk at 200 yards can retain up to 140 grains of weight and still deliver a significant wound channel. In comparison, a 160-grain AccuBond bullet fired at the same velocity into the same elk at the same distance would likely expand to approximately 240 grains, but may not retain as much weight or deliver as significant of a wound channel.

Real-World Considerations

When choosing between the Nosler Partition and AccuBond bullets, it’s essential to consider the specific hunting application and game being targeted. For example, if hunting large, heavy game like bears or elk, the Partition bullet’s unique design may be a better choice due to its exceptional weight retention. In contrast, if hunting smaller game like deer or antelope, the AccuBond bullet’s consistent expansion may be a better choice. Ultimately, the choice between these two bullets will depend on personal preference, experience, and specific hunting conditions.