Quick Answer
Leasing solar panels is generally better for homeowners with limited upfront capital, as it eliminates the initial cost and typically offers lower monthly payments. However, buying solar panels provides long-term savings and potential appreciation in value. The best option depends on individual circumstances, including roof size, energy usage, and local incentives.
Understanding Solar Leases
A solar lease allows homeowners to use solar energy without paying for the panels outright. Typically, the leasing company owns the panels, and the homeowner pays a monthly fee for the electricity generated. This fee is usually lower than the electricity bills from the grid, but it may not decrease over time. For example, a 5 kW solar lease might cost $50-60 per month, with the leasing company owning the panels for 20 years.
Calculating Solar Savings
To determine which option is better, it’s essential to calculate the solar savings for both buying and leasing. A 5 kW solar system can generate around 7,200 kWh per year in a sunny location. Assuming an electricity cost of $0.15 per kWh, buying a 5 kW solar system can save a homeowner around $1,080 per year. Over 20 years, this amounts to $21,600 in savings. However, leasing the same system might cost around $10,800 over 20 years, plus the initial lease fee.
Assessing Long-Term Costs
When evaluating long-term costs, consider the potential for solar panel efficiency and battery storage technology advancements. As these technologies improve, the value of the solar panels may increase, making buying a better option. Additionally, consider local incentives, such as tax credits or rebates, which may offset the initial cost of buying solar panels. By weighing these factors, homeowners can make an informed decision about whether to buy or lease solar panels.
Find more answers
Browse the full Q&A library by topic, or jump back to the topic this question belongs to.