Harrison County, MS
211,044 residents · 574 sq mi · 367.9/sq mi · 19% rural
About Harrison County
Harrison County is a county located in the U.S. state of Mississippi. As of the 2020 census, Harrison County is the second-most populous county in Mississippi with a population of 208,621; although the most recent population estimate from 2024 suggests Harrison County has overtaken Hinds County to become the state's most populous county, with a population of 213,730. Its county seats are Biloxi and Gulfport. The county is named after U.S. President William Henry Harrison. Harrison County is part of the Gulfport-Biloxi metropolitan area. The county was severely damaged from both Hurricane Camille on August 17, 1969, and Hurricane Katrina on August 29, 2005, causing catastrophic effects.
Prepper Assessment
This area features a humid subtropical climate with an annual mean temperature of 67.1°F and significant rainfall at 65.5 inches per year. The growing season is relatively long, well-suited for a variety of crops typical of USDA zone 10a. However, the county's high population density of 367.9 people per square mile may limit the availability of remote land for self-sufficient living. The terrain is characterized by coastal plains, which could provide opportunities for fishing and other water-related activities.
Natural hazards pose significant risks, with the county ranking high for hurricanes (98) and other storms, including tornadoes (96) and heat waves (95). The violence percentile is 74, indicating higher than average concerns for safety compared to other areas. The cost of living appears manageable, with a median home price of $185,000 and a low property tax rate of 0.68%, but potential residents should weigh these risks against their lifestyle preferences and preparedness capabilities.
This county may be suitable for those who prioritize access to urban amenities and are prepared for the associated risks of living in a densely populated area prone to severe weather events. Individuals seeking a remote, self-sufficient lifestyle may find the density and natural hazards challenging. Those with flexible work arrangements and a strong focus on disaster preparedness could thrive here, while traditional homesteaders may see the high population density and storm risks as dealbreakers.
